The best way to use icons in Web UIs

18 min read

What if I told you, you could use CSS to insert and tweak icons without touching any HTML? And that it could be more flexible and maintainable than what you’ve been using?

CSS, UI Design, Icons, Design Systems

I’ve always had a soft spot for icons1There’s a small chance I may have been the first to use a web font for UI icons, in 2010. I even worked as Product Lead at Font Awesome for a bit. . Not only do they add polish to a UI, they can also tangibly improve usability. Familiar icons help users find what they need quickly, since we recognize pictures much faster than we read words.

And as a web architect at heart, the current dominant ways we have to include icons on the Web make me sad. While there are many, many different ways to include icons in a Web UI, each with different performance characteristics, by far the most common ones involve adding inline SVG to the HTML. For example, a trash icon might be included like this:

<button>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" class="lucide lucide-trash preview-icon"><path d="M10 11v6"/><path d="M14 11v6"/><path d="M19 6v14a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H7a2 2 0 0 1-2-2V6"/><path d="M3 6h18"/><path d="M8 6V4a2 2 0 0 1 2-2h4a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2"/></svg>
Delete
</button>

Some people use a separate SVG file for sanity and include icons via <use>, but the markup is still fairly clunky (not to mention slow, sans bundlers). All this clunkiness forces people to resort to hiding the icon under layers of abstraction, such as dedicated custom elements like <x-icon name="trash"></x-icon> or React components like <TrashIcon />, but the ugliness still ships under all these layers, and the browser still has to deal with it.

Icon fonts did put icons in CSS (::before { content: "\f1f8" } is still how Font Awesome’s pseudo-element mode works), and a lot of their appeal was exactly that. But they came with a long list of issues: large downloads (even with subsetting), fallback glyphs when the font fails to load, screen readers announcing private-use codepoints, user font overrides (e.g. for dyslexia) wiping them out, and text hinting that was never designed for pictures. We threw out the baby with the bathwater: the problem was the font, not the CSS.

Many of the attempts to move this to CSS still involve markup. The mask trick that most of them rely on is not new either: Chen Hui Jing covered it in 2021, and Iconify generates mask-based CSS for its entire catalog. But in all of these, which icon to use (and whether to use one at all) is still decided in the markup, via one class per icon; CSS only handles color. The closest I’ve seen is David Bushell’s 2024 post on including icons purely via CSS via generated content + masks, where the icon is picked in CSS, but every selector that wants to support icons needs its own chunk of CSS, and there is no way to override the icon on a case by case basis. I still think it’s superior to inline SVG in HTML, and it baffles me why it isn’t more popular.

A user-centered icon system

Per the principles outlined in my user effort article, a good icon system should:

  1. keep syntax close to the minimum necessary to declare intent, and
  2. make simple things easy, complex things possible, and the transition from one to the other smooth (no usability cliffs)

How does that translate to an icon system?

Per consumers > producers, making icon usage ergonomic is more important than making icon definition ergonomic, but ideally adding a new icon to the icon system should not require much more than:

And of course, it still needs to be reasonably performant — the existing success criteria don’t disappear!

The dominant ways to include icons today fail to meet at least one of these criteria. Can we do better?

Why CSS?

CSS is the only web platform language that facilitates reactive aggregation: you declare what applies to what conditions (type of element, interaction state, media query, etc.) and the browser automatically applies the right styles when those conditions are met and cleanly removes them when they are no longer met, without affecting any other conditions that simultaneously apply to the element, and without forcing developers to manage any of these side effects manually.

I personally think we are underutilizing this wonderful language by artificially restricting it to styling, but that’s a topic for another article.

If we can nail icons via CSS, this gives us tremendous expressive power, with practically no loss of flexibility.

Imagine being able to tweak icons based on…

Additionally, if icons can be injected or tweaked via CSS, this means we can specify them on pseudo-elements, such as details::marker, select::picker-icon, or option::checkmark, something no markup solution accommodates.

Or even, imagine applying entirely different icon sets to the entire page (or a portion) without having to touch any markup! E.g. a section with a hand-drawn aesthetic could get a hand-drawn icon set, without affecting the rest of the UI.

The possibilities are endless. Once you allow yourself to consider that this is possible, you will start seeing use cases everywhere.

Icons should be design tokens

Including icons as direct <svg>s (especially with no wrapping abstraction to manage a shared registry) means there is no way to enforce consistency — anything goes. One page might use a Font Awesome trash icon, another might use a Lucide trash icon.

I think the icons themselves should be a type of design token, managed by the design system, that UI components simply use, just like colors and gradients.

Managing icons via CSS also allows us to define them alongside other design tokens (e.g. as CSS variables on :root), rather than in a separate place.

What does it look like?

Suppose icons were CSS variables, and we could add an icon to an element simply by setting an --icon custom property, e.g. by doing something like

<button style="--icon: var(--icon-trash)">Delete</button>

This means we could also make simple things easy via:

button.delete {
  --icon: var(--icon-trash);
}

while maintaining the ability to override the icon on a case by case basis by simply overridding the --icon property.

We can even adapt to state reactively:

button.delete {
	--icon: var(--icon-trash-outlined);

	@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
		--icon: var(--icon-trash-filled);
	}

	&:hover {
		background: var(--color-danger);
		/* See https://lea.verou.me/blog/2024/contrast-color/
			for making it adapt automatically */
		color: var(--color-danger-text);
	}
}

a[href^="https://"] {
	@media print {
		--icon-end: var(--icon-link-external);
	}
}

or user interaction, e.g. to communicate both where a link goes (GitHub) and what it is (an external link):

a.github {
	--icon: var(--icon-github);

	&:hover {
		--icon: var(--icon-link-external);
	}
}

And for completely ad hoc standalone icons where adding CSS would be more work than doing it inline in HTML, we can have an .icon class:

<i class="icon" style="--icon: var(--icon-trash)"></i>

This makes it strictly more powerful than the markup approaches, with the only exception being that completely inline SVG allows potentially changing the SVG itself in arbitrary ways (e.g. morphing it into another icon or changing it dynamically as the result of user input). For those cases, we’d still need inline SVGs. But how many of your icons fall in that category?

How it works

The core idea can be summarized as:

Rendering and referencing icons

Icons are inserted via pseudo-elements, which use the icon to mask a square with background equal to the icon color.

The referencing syntax I’ve settled on is:

You could be more elaborate and also define --icon-[state] properties like --icon-hover, --icon-focus etc, if you deem them useful! The beauty of this approach is its immense flexibility.

Available icons are defined on :root as CSS variables, e.g.:

:root {
	/* Embedded, for performance */
	--icon-trash: url("data:image/svg+xml,<svg viewBox='0 0 448 512' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'><path d="…"></svg>");

	/* Remote SVGs work fine too! */
	--icon-link-external: url("icons/link-external.svg");

	/* more icons here */
}

One-off icons can still be used by setting e.g. --icon: url(…) instead of --icon: var(--icon-foo), but if most UI references registered icons, they will stand out like a sore thumb and will be easy to spot in a review.

Then, to display these as icons, the crux is:

For simplicity, I will only discuss --icon-start/::before in the rest of this section, but everything applies identically to --icon-end/::after and any additional ones.

::before {
	content: "";
	display: inline-block;
	width: 1em;
	height: 1em;
	background-color: currentColor;
	mask: var(--icon-start) no-repeat center / contain;
}

Why not use aspect-ratio?

You may be wondering why I’m specifying the size twice instead of width: 1em; aspect-ratio: 1. Flex items stretch by default, and a stretched size is definite, so aspect-ratio is ignored. Since icons so often live in buttons, and buttons are so often display: flex, an explicit height is far more robust. Grid happens to be fine (align-self: normal behaves as start for items with an aspect ratio), but flex has no such exception.

Unfortunately, you need to repeat the pseudo-element contents for every type of pseudo-element you want to be able to support icons on. Mixins will eventually fix that.

Restricting it to only elements that actually have an icon

As described above, this would apply to all elements, which is far from ideal!

We can use a style query (finally Baseline! 🎉) to restrict this to only elements with the --icon-start property set:

@container style(--icon-start) {
	::before {
		/* same as above * /
	}
}

We would also need to register --icon-start as non-inheriting via @property, otherwise any container with an icon would sprout an icon for every single descendant (including inline formatting like <strong>, <em> etc!), which we definitely don’t want.

@property --icon-start {
	syntax: '*';
	inherits: false;
}

And then just explicitly inherit them in the pseudo-element:

@container style(--icon-start) {
	::before {
		--icon-start: inherit;
		/* same as above * /
	}
}

But can I really depend on style queries?

Style queries are Baseline 2026, which sounds quite cutting edge. However, if you look at market share, it is supported in ~93% of users’ browsers worldwide per Can I Use data. While this data under-represents old Chrome Android (it lumps all Chrome Android under its latest version), Chrome shipped style queries in 2023 (in version 111) and Chrome Mobile users do seem to upgrade pretty quickly, so the real number won’t be meaningfully lower.

How is this possible? If you sort by date, you will see that all major browsers except Firefox had shipped style queries by 2024. Firefox was the last one to ship them, in May 2026.

Sorting style queries by date on CanIUse

Now, let’s see the Usage relative chart:

Sorting style queries by market share on CanIUse

Firefox as a whole accounts for 2.28% of worldwide market share.

Now, I’m not saying ignore Firefox because of its low market share! That would be a d*ck move, comparable to making UIs inaccessible because screen reader users are a minority. Some things matter more than their raw numbers might indicate, and not excluding Firefox is essential for the Web to remain open, interoperable, and not controlled solely by large companies.

That said, for features that have shipped in every major browser, I think it’s defensible to take market share into account. Baseline tiers are a great …baseline, but no compact metric could possibly convey this kind of granularity.

Especially for something like this, where things generally still work fine without icons, it’s a plausible strategy to treat icons as a progressive enhancement and just accept not having them in the 7% of browsers that don’t support them.

For the cases where icons are crucial, (e.g. icon-only controls) we can use a class (e.g. .icon, .icon-start, .icon-end, etc), so that older browsers with no style query support still get them.

Then, how much you want to lean in to progressive enhancement depends on how widely you rely on the class vs the style query.

You could even add other known selectors to it e.g. inline styles or known selectors with icons:

.icon-start,
[style*="--icon-start:"],
button.delete {
	&::before {
		/* ... */
	}
}

Do note that unrestricted attribute selectors like that can be slow, so use them judiciously.

One issue with the class approach is that it hardcodes icon presence, even if you can still tweak the icon itself via CSS custom properties.

One way to deal with this is to specify a content value that becomes IACVT if the custom property has no value, which would make the entire pseudo-element disappear:

.icon-start::before {
	content: image-set(
		linear-gradient(transparent 0 100%),
		var(--icon-start)
	);
	/* ... */
}

This will resolve content to a transparent image if --icon-start is defined, and to unset → none if it is not, which will effectively remove the pseudo-element. And yes, image-set() is Baseline Widely Available. It doesn’t remove any of the other properties, so it still cannot compose with other ::before styles, so don’t apply it so broadly it can clash with other elements that may have ::before styles.

Adding polish

The styles above are a start, but we can do better:

Working around Safari bugs

Putting it all together so far, we get something like this

<link rel="stylesheet" href="icon-tokens.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.css">
<style>
/* Icon system */
/* Icon defs on :root */
@import url("icon-tokens.css");

@property --icon-start {
	syntax: '*';
	inherits: false;
}

@container style(--icon-start) {
	::before {
		--icon-start: inherit;
		content: "" / var(--icon-style-alt, "");
		display: inline-block;
		vertical-align: calc(var(--icon-style-size, 1em) / 2 - 0.48lh);
		width: var(--icon-style-size, 1em);
		height: var(--icon-style-size, 1em);
		margin-inline-end: var(--icon-style-spacing, .3em);
		background-color: var(--icon-style-color, currentColor);
		mask: var(--icon-start) no-repeat center / contain;
		pointer-events: none;
		flex: none;
		forced-color-adjust: none;
	}
}
</style>
<style>
/* Button styles (relevant subset) */
button {
	:where(&) {
		/* Redirect --icon to something more specific */
		--icon-start: var(--icon);
	}

	&:hover {
		--icon-start: var(--icon-hover, var(--icon));
	}

	&.danger {
		--icon: var(--icon-trash-outlined);

		&:hover {
			--icon: var(--icon-trash);
		}
	}
}
</style>

<button>No icon</button>
<button style="--icon: var(--icon-github)">One-off icon</button>
<button class="danger">Default icon</button>
<button class="danger">With <strong>inline <em>style</em></strong></button>
<button style="--icon: var(--icon-github); --icon-hover: var(--icon-link-external);">GitHub to link</button>

If you’re viewing the demo in Chrome or Firefox, it should work as expected. If you’re viewing the demo in Safari, you’ll already know that it’s severely broken.

My research on this resulted in filing not one, but two Safari bug reports. The good news is that all have workarounds. The bad news is that these workarounds force us into suboptimal code, and unless we’re willing to ship a different version to Safari, everyone suffers.

Working around WebKit bugs #301609 and #320220

WebKit bug #301609 was the one that really threw a spanner in the works the most for this technique: The tl;dr is if you use what I wrote above, the icons will not show up in Safari until the user interacts with them in some way (e.g. hover, focus, etc.).

Thankfully, I found a CSS workaround:

/* Workaround for https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301609
   A zero-duration animation on the pseudo-elements forces WebKit
   to re-resolve style, this time against the correct container.
   Must be outside the @container block (which is false on the first pass).
*/
@keyframes webkit-301609 {}

/* List all relevant pseudo-elements here */
::before, ::after {
	animation: webkit-301609 0s;
}

However, since this applies an animation to all ::before and ::after pseudo-elements, ideally we’d want to restrict it a bit, and make it easier to override by wrapping it in a layer.

/* Workaround for https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301609
   A zero-duration animation on the pseudo-elements forces WebKit
   to re-resolve style, this time against the correct container.
   Must be outside the @container block (which is false on the first pass). */
@keyframes webkit-301609 {}

/* Safari 18+. WebKit-only properties ORed for robustness */
@supports ((-webkit-nbsp-mode: normal) or (-webkit-touch-callout: none) or (font: -apple-system-body)) and (content-visibility: auto) {
	@layer webkit-301609-fix {
		::before, ::after {
			animation: webkit-301609 0s;
		}
	}
}

Turns out this seems to magically also fix WebKit bug #320220, which is also relevant here.

At this point our demo works almost perfectly!

<link rel="stylesheet" href="icon-tokens.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.css">
<style>
/* Icon system */
/* Icon defs on :root */
@import url("icon-tokens.css");

@property --icon-start {
	syntax: '*';
	inherits: false;
}

@container style(--icon-start) {
	::before {
		--icon-start: inherit;
		content: "" / var(--icon-style-alt, "");
		display: inline-block;
		vertical-align: calc(var(--icon-style-size, 1em) / 2 - 0.48lh);
		width: var(--icon-style-size, 1em);
		height: var(--icon-style-size, 1em);
		margin-inline-end: var(--icon-style-spacing, .3em);
		background-color: var(--icon-style-color, currentColor);
		mask: var(--icon-start) no-repeat center / contain;
		pointer-events: none;
		flex: none;
		forced-color-adjust: none;
	}
}

/* Workaround for https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301609
   A zero-duration animation on the pseudo-elements forces WebKit
   to re-resolve style, this time against the correct container.
   Must be outside the @container block (which is false on the first pass). */
@keyframes webkit-301609 {}
/* Safari 18+ only */
@supports ((-webkit-nbsp-mode: normal) or (-webkit-touch-callout: none) or (font: -apple-system-body)) and (content-visibility: auto) {
	@layer webkit-301609-fix {
		::before, ::after {
			animation: webkit-301609 0s;
		}
	}
}
</style>
<style>
/* Button styles (relevant subset) */
button {
	:where(&) {
		/* Redirect --icon to something more specific */
		--icon-start: var(--icon);
	}

	&:hover {
		--icon-start: var(--icon-hover, var(--icon));
	}

	&.danger {
		--icon: var(--icon-trash-outlined);

		&:hover {
			--icon: var(--icon-trash);
		}
	}
}
</style>

<button>No icon</button>
<button style="--icon: var(--icon-github)">One-off icon</button>
<button class="danger">Default icon</button>
<button class="danger">With <strong>inline <em>style</em></strong></button>
<button style="--icon: var(--icon-github); --icon-hover: var(--icon-link-external);">GitHub to link</button>

Can you spot the bug that remains?

Working around WebKit bug #325900

There are two buttons that change their icon on hover: Default icon and Github to link. The former works, the latter doesn’t. WAT?!

So, there is a difference between them: .danger sets --icon on hover, whereas Github to link sets --icon-start directly, via --icon-hover. And --icon-start is registered as non-inheriting, which is quite relevant here.

Turns out that --non-inherited: inherit used to not work at all in Safari until 2023, and there are still some cases where it reproduces today. The investigation resulted in WebKit bug #325900 being filed.

There are a few solutions here of which the only workable one seems to be to register the property as inherited after all, and add a style query that resets it on descendants:

@property --icon-start {
	syntax: '*';
	inherits: true;
}

@container style(--icon-start) {
	* {
		--icon-start: initial;
	}
}
/* ... */

It’s a bit more fragile and likely slower, so ideally we’d only ship it to Safari. @supports can only detect features, not bugs, so once more we have to resort to sniffing WebKit. Conveniently, @property is allowed inside conditional rules, and when a property is registered multiple times, the last registration wins:

@property --icon-start {
	syntax: '*';
	inherits: false;
}

/* Workaround for https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325900
   `inherit` on non-inherited registered properties is unreliable,
   so register them as inherited and reset them on descendants instead. */
@supports ((-webkit-nbsp-mode: normal) or (-webkit-touch-callout: none) or (font: -apple-system-body)) and (content-visibility: auto) {
	@property --icon-start {
		syntax: '*';
		inherits: true;
	}

	@layer webkit-325900-fix {
		@container style(--icon-start) {
			* {
				--icon-start: initial;
			}
		}
	}
}
/* ... */

The layer means any unlayered declaration wins over the reset, even zero-specificity ones like :where(button) { --icon-start: var(--icon) }.

Demo

Putting it all together, here is the final demo, with both workarounds applied:

<link rel="stylesheet" href="icon-tokens.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.css">
<style>
/* Icon system */
/* Icon defs on :root */
@import url("icon-tokens.css");

@property --icon-start {
	syntax: '*';
	inherits: false;
}

@container style(--icon-start) {
	::before {
		--icon-start: inherit;
		content: "" / var(--icon-style-alt, "");
		display: inline-block;
		vertical-align: calc(var(--icon-style-size, 1em) / 2 - 0.48lh);
		width: var(--icon-style-size, 1em);
		height: var(--icon-style-size, 1em);
		margin-inline-end: var(--icon-style-spacing, .3em);
		background-color: var(--icon-style-color, currentColor);
		mask: var(--icon-start) no-repeat center / contain;
		pointer-events: none;
		flex: none;
		forced-color-adjust: none;
	}
}

/* Workaround for https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301609
   A zero-duration animation on the pseudo-elements forces WebKit
   to re-resolve style, this time against the correct container.
   Must be outside the @container block (which is false on the first pass). */
@keyframes webkit-301609 {}

/* Safari 18+ only */
@supports ((-webkit-nbsp-mode: normal) or (-webkit-touch-callout: none) or (font: -apple-system-body)) and (content-visibility: auto) {
	@layer webkit-301609-fix {
		::before, ::after {
			animation: webkit-301609 0s;
		}
	}

	/* Workaround for https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325900
	   `inherit` on non-inherited registered properties is unreliable,
	   so register them as inherited and reset them on descendants instead. */
	@property --icon-start {
		syntax: '*';
		inherits: true;
	}

	@layer webkit-325900-fix {
		@container style(--icon-start) {
			* {
				--icon-start: initial;
			}
		}
	}
}
</style>
<style>
/* Button styles (relevant subset) */
button {
	:where(&) {
		/* Redirect --icon to something more specific */
		--icon-start: var(--icon);
	}

	&:hover {
		--icon-start: var(--icon-hover, var(--icon));
	}

	&.danger {
		--icon: var(--icon-trash-outlined);

		&:hover {
			--icon: var(--icon-trash);
		}
	}
}
</style>

<button>No icon</button>
<button style="--icon: var(--icon-github)">One-off icon</button>
<button class="danger">Default icon</button>
<button class="danger">With <strong>inline <em>style</em></strong></button>
<button style="--icon: var(--icon-github); --icon-hover: var(--icon-link-external);">GitHub to link</button>

Using remote icons

When using icons from SVG files it’s important to remember that any relative URL will resolve relative to the CSS file that uses the icon, not the one it’s defined in. In practice, this forces you to use root-relative URLs (e.g. url('/assets/icons/trash.svg')), otherwise you’ll have random breakage in any nontrivial project structure.

An alternative is to register the icon properties as <image> via @property and specify their values via initial-value:

@property --icon-caret {
	syntax: '<image>';
	inherits: true;
	initial-value: url("icons/caret.svg");
}

This is also better for other reasons:

The obvious downside is DX: there is a lot more boilerplate to define an icon this way. The earlier syntax can be managed by hand, even for many icons. This starts requiring a build step after a dozen or so.

Additionally, registered properties are currently global and don’t work in shadow roots, so that may not fit every use case.

Another option might be to go through all --icon-* properties in :root and register them via JS:

const cs = getComputedStyle(document.documentElement);
const iconTokens = [...cs].filter(p => p.startsWith("--icon-") && !p.startsWith("--icon-style"));
for (let name of iconTokens) {
	if (!name.startsWith("--icon-")) continue;
	const initialValue = cs.getPropertyValue(name);

	CSS.registerProperty({name, inherits: true, syntax: "<image>", initialValue });
}

An even cleaner option, if you know which stylesheet includes the icon tokens (and it’s same-origin) is to use the CSS OM to actually edit it, so that the :root declarations are removed once you register the properties:

const sheet = [...document.styleSheets].find(s => s.href?.endsWith("/icon-tokens.css"));

// Copy, since we modify the sheet while iterating
for (let { style } of [...sheet.cssRules]) {
	for (let name of [...style]) {
		if (!name.startsWith("--icon-")) continue;

		sheet.insertRule(`@property ${name} {
			syntax: "<image>";
			inherits: true;
			initial-value: ${style.getPropertyValue(name)};
		}`);
		style.removeProperty(name);
	}
}

Other caveats

Multi-color icons

Since the icon is a mask, this technique only works for monochrome icons (varied opacity is fine) — but most icons are monochrome these days anyway. If you really need more, Allegro’s engineers stack masks on the element and both its pseudo-elements, which gets you up to three colors from a single element.

But what about full color icons, e.g. emojis? Or textual icons, e.g. …emojis?

In theory, the technique can work fine with them, these are actually easier! For full color icons you just set them as background images, no masking required. And for textual icons, you can just set them directly on the content property.

The only challenge here is branching between these three. But this may be the subject of a future post, as this is already getting quite long.

Icons with backgrounds etc.

Since the entire pseudo-element is masked, you cannot apply a separate background or border to it. For that, you’d need an actual element (e.g. <i class="icon">), and you can apply the borders, backgrounds, etc to that.

What about animation?

Completely arbitrary animation would obviously still require inline <svg> elements.

But what about predefined animations? A checkmark or X being drawn, a hamburger animating to a close button, etc.?

I thought I had figured out a way. And I did get so close! Close enough that the whole saga deserves its own post, so stay tuned 😉

The North Star

The system above gets us pretty good DX (especially without the Safari bugs!), but some things are still not ideal.

First, the masking approach does introduce some limitations it would be nice to be able to get rid of.

Then, signal-to-noise ratio could be even better:

And while consumers > producers, it would be really nice if adding support for new pseudo-element types did not require such a song-and-dance.

A number of upcoming CSS features get us closer to this North Star.

Linked parameters = arbitrary customizations!

If you haven’t heard of the new CSS Linked Parameters spec, it’s the best thing that has happened to CSS icons in a long time.

It allows us to pass arbitrary data to any resource that supports it (and yes, SVG is one of them), which means we can customize icons in ways that were previously impossible, such as changing the stroke width, color, or even entirely arbitrary customizations, since SVG also supports style queries.

And as of a couple weeks ago, it also supports passing color and accent-color without any double opt-in from the icon, which means we can use any existing icon library without it having to be updated to utilize them!

--icon: url("icons/link.svg");
link-parameters: param(color)
	param(--stroke-width, 2px);

There are some limitations still, but it is being actively designed, Firefox has shipped an earlier version of the spec, and is one of the top Interop 2027 proposals, so I’m quite hopeful it can make it much easier to use icons in CSS. Keep a close eye on that one!

Soon we won’t need to use backgrounds

Currently, due to a technicality in how the content property is handled, we have to rely on background images to include icons, because otherwise width and height don’t work. Even Link Parameters by itself won’t change that, it will just allow us to get rid of the masking hack.

Thankfully, we (CSS WG) recently resolved on a change that will fix this! (pending compat analysis)

ident() would let use identifiers instead of CSS variables

ident() is the CSS feature you didn’t know you were desperate for, and deserves an article of its own for its myriad of use cases in design systems. Until I write that, Bramus has a great write-up.

But more relevant to icons, once ident() is widely supported, we can construct variable names dynamically, meaning we can use plain identifiers instead of CSS variables, which will make the syntax even cleaner, meaning we’d be able to translate --icon-start-trash into var(--icon-start-trash) at the cost of a little complexity on the producer side:

--_icon-start: var(ident(--icon- var(--icon-start)));

Yes, it’s ugly, but it’s also an implementation detail that’s not exposed to icon consumers, so I think the tradeoff is worth it.

Combined with expanded attr(), which is getting there with only Safari remaining (Safari TP already supports it), this also unlocks ad hoc icons via a plain attribute:

<i data-icon="trash"></i>

[data-icon] {
	--_icon-start: var(ident(--icon- attr(data-icon)));
}

More ergonomic mass property registration

We recently resolved to support registering multiple properties with the same descriptors at once via @property --prop1, --prop2, --prop3 { … }, this won’t help much here, since we need different initial values.

You could of course register multiple properties with the <image> syntax and then also set their actual icons on :root but now you need to add each icon in two places, so I’d consider it worse than the current expanded @property syntax.

However, another direction we are exploring in the CSS WG is a shorthand form of @property that would allow more compact registration. For the icon above it would look like this:

@property --icon-caret <image> = url("icons/caret.svg");

@mixin will allow us to centralize pseudo-element styles

Currently, we have to repeat a lot of styles between the different pseudo-elements. If we want to also have a fallback class that doesn’t depend on style queries, we need to repeat them four times!

With @mixin we can just do:

@mixin --icon {
	content: "";
	display: inline-block;
	vertical-align: calc(0.5em - 0.48lh);
	width: 1em;
	height: 1em;
	background-color: currentColor;
	mask: no-repeat center / contain;
	pointer-events: none;
	flex: none;
}

@mixin --icon-start {
	@apply --icon;
	--icon-start: inherit;
	margin-inline-end: .3em;
	mask-image: var(--icon-start);
}

@mixin --icon-end {
	@apply --icon;
	--icon-end: inherit;
	margin-inline-start: .3em;
	mask-image: var(--icon-end);
}

And then we can use them all over the place:

.icon {
	--icon-start: var(--icon);
}

.icon::before,
.icon-start::before {
	@apply --icon-start;
}

.icon-end::after {
	@apply --icon-end;
}

@container style(--icon-start) {
	::before {
		@apply --icon-start;
	}
}

@container style(--icon-end) {
	::after {
		@apply --icon-end;
	}
}

@container style(--icon-marker) {
	::marker {
		@apply --icon-marker;
	}
}

/* and so on… */

Use it today via @nudeui/icons!

I published a package that puts together everything from this post, polish and warts included. It contains no icons, just the icon system. You’d just include it and then you can use --icon-start and --icon-end in your styles. It also includes the .icon, .icon-start, and .icon-end classes. It does not wrap its contents in a layer to give you maximum choice, but I’d recommend importing it in a layer anyway.

@nudeui/icons


2 footnotes
  1. There’s a small chance I may have been the first to use a web font for UI icons, in 2010. I even worked as Product Lead at Font Awesome for a bit. ↩︎

  2. I’m using “components” here in the general sense of a reusable UI element, not in the sense of a framework component or a custom element. E.g. a styled <button> or an <article class="callout"> would qualify. ↩︎

Reactions

likes on Bluesky

Like this post on Bluesky to see your face on this page

Comments